Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 107 F.2d 162 - Cundiff v. Nicholson

Cundiff v. Nicholson’s Empirical Analysis

107 F.2d 162 · 1939

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
3
states following
October 1966
most recently cited

15 federal appellate · 2 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 1966

15 federal appellate · 2 district · 3 state decisions

1601939194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Johnson v. Zerbst · Erwin v. Sanford · Logan v. Johnston · United States ex rel. Austin v. Williams

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Where an accused personally enters a plea of guilty to a crime whereof he stands charged, and does so understandingly, freely and voluntarily without asking the assistance of counsel, a waiver of the right to be represented by counsel may fairly be inferred.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.