Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 107 F.2d 440 - Shingleton v. Armour Boulevard Corp.

Shingleton v. Armour Boulevard Corp.’s Empirical Analysis

107 F.2d 440 · 1939

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
September 1982
most recently cited

Relationships

Relies on Cook v. Tullis · Wager v. Hall · In re Schwartz · In re Condon · Lansing Boiler & Engine Works v. Ryerson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Creditor shall include anyone who owns a debt, demand, or claim provable in bankruptcy, and may include his duly authorized agent, attorney, or proxy. 11 U.S.C. § 1 (11).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.