Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 107 F.2d 721 - Ginsberg v. Lindel

Ginsberg v. Lindel’s Empirical Analysis

107 F.2d 721 · 1939

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
3
states following
October 2011
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 3 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently October 2011 · most notably Thorp Credit & Thrift Co. v. Pommerer (In Re Pommerer) (1981), Rodrock v. Security Industrial Bank (1980)

6 federal appellate · 3 district · 3 state decisions

150193919401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 104 · 11 U.S.C. § 107

Relies on Local Loan Co. v. Hunt · Louisville Joint Stock Land Bank v. Radford · Continental Illinois Nat Bank Trust Co of Chicago v. Chicago R I & P Ry Co · Wright v. Vinton Branch of Mountain Trust Bank · Kuehner v. Irving Trust Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “... It is the general rule that a retrospective operation will not be given to a statute which interferes with antecedent rights, unless such be the unequivocal and inflexible import of its terms and the manifest intention of the legislature.”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “When such requirements of the Iowa law for recording have been complied with the record is constructive notice to all the world of the contents of the instrument creating the lien and of the rights of the parties thereto.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.