107 F.3d -1204 - Chatman v. Slagle’s Empirical Analysis
107 F.3d 380 · 1997
Citation profile
6 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently November 2010
6 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics · Heck v. Humphrey · Chambers v. Maroney · Gerstein v. Pugh · Preiser v. Rodriguez
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'unless it manifests plain injustice, or is so grossly excessive as to be clearly erroneous.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“intimidation, marital problems, weight loss, loss of sleep, shock, or humiliation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Bloch v. Ribar
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.