Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 107 F.3d -1349 - Roller v. Gunn

107 F.3d -1349 - Roller v. Gunn’s Empirical Analysis

107 F.3d 227 · 1997

Citation profile

38
cited by 38 later decisions
September 2018
most recently cited

25 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently September 2018 · most notably Giarratano v. Johnson (2008), Mitchell v. Farcass (1997)

25 federal appellate ·

180199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1915 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Preiser v. Rodriguez · Hanna v. Plumer · Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc. · Michigan v. Long · Bounds v. Smith

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'Requiring prisoners to make economic decisions about filing lawsuits does not deny access to the courts; it merely places the indigent prisoner in a position similar to that faced by those whose basic costs of living are not paid by the state.'”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[T]he right of access to federal courts is not a free-floating right, but rather is subject to Congress's Article III power to set limits on federal legislation.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “Congress is no more compelled to guarantee free access to federal courts than it is to provide unlimited access to them.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.