Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 107 F.3d -1514 - Frances-Colon v. Ramirez

107 F.3d -1514 - Frances-Colon v. Ramirez’s Empirical Analysis

107 F.3d 62 · 1997

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
September 2016
most recently cited

10 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently September 2016

10 federal appellate ·

70199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Daniels v. Williams · Joshua Deshaney, a Minor, by His Guardian Ad Litem, and Melody Deshaney,s v. Winnebago County Department of Social Services, et al. · Dwares v. City of New York · Lawton v. State Mutual Life Assurance Co. of America · Pittsley v. Warish

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “can support a personal injury claim under Section 1983 in the rare and exceptional cases when a government employee affirmatively acts to increase the threat of harm to the claimant). In addition, the Fourth Circuit considered a state-created danger claim and noted that there may be some”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.