107 F.3d -294 - Perkins v. Chater’s Empirical Analysis
107 F.3d 1290 · 1997
Citation profile
9 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently July 2015
9 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 423 (§ 223 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Richardson v. Perales · Sullivan v. Finkelstein · Diaz v. Chater · Eads v. Secretary Department Health Human Services · Newton v. Chater
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“`New' evidence is evidence `not in existence or available to the claimant at the time of the administrative proceeding.'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Stepp v. Colvin · Jens v. Barnhart“new evidence which is material and that there is good cause for the failure to incorporate such evidence into the record in a prior proceeding.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[A] critique of the ALJ’s opinion, which obviously could not have been done before the opinion issued, does not amount to good cause; such a rule would amount to automatic permission to supplement records with new evidence after the ALJ issues a decision in the case, which would seriously undermine the regularity of the administrative process.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Simila v. Astrue
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.