Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 107 F.3d -493 - United States v. Singleton

107 F.3d -493 - United States v. Singleton’s Empirical Analysis

107 F.3d 1091 · 1997

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
April 2018
most recently cited

19 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently April 2018

19 federal appellate ·

130199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Anders v. California · Johnson v. Zerbst · Faretta v. California · Gideon v. Wainwright · Penson v. Ohio

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “And if a defendant first asserts his right to self-representation after trial has begun, the right may have been waived.”). Bush's motion in this case was filed about a week before trial, and was therefore timely. 6 . Bush also contends, without citation, that the motion to sever cannot permit any time under the Speedy Trial Act to be excluded because he did not consent to the filing of the motion by defense counsel. This argument lacks merit. 7 . The Government notes that we have never held what constitutes a”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “failure to conduct a formal inquiry [is not] per se reversible error. . . . [T]he trial judge is merely required to determine the sufficiency of the waiver from the record as a whole rather than from a formalistic, deliberate, and searching inquiry.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “must 'traverse . . . a thin line' between improperly allowing the defendant to proceed pro se, thereby violating his right to counsel, and improperly having the defendant proceed with counsel, thereby violating his right to self-representation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.