107 F.3d -730 - Center v. Dalton’s Empirical Analysis
107 F.3d 854 · 1997
Citation profile
3 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 41 U.S.C. § 321 · 41 U.S.C. § 605 · 41 U.S.C. § 609
Relies on Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Schor · Grumman Data Systems Corp. v. Dalton · Sanchez and Son Incorporated v. United States · Dalton v. Cessna Aircraft Co. · Alaska Lumber & Pulp Co. v. Madigan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In government contract disputes, unlike contract disputes between two private parties, the initial determination in each dispute is made by one of the parties, ie., the CO. Congress commanded that the CO’s decision on any matter cannot be denied Board review.... Permitting parties to contract away Board review entirely would subvert this purpose and return contractors to the position they occupied before the passage of the CDA.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.