Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 107 F.3d -78 - USA v. Olin Corp.

107 F.3d -78 - USA v. Olin Corp.’s Empirical Analysis

107 F.3d 1506 · 1997

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
July 2013
most recently cited

21 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently July 2013

21 federal appellate ·

120199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 922 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act) · 42 U.S.C. § 9601 (§ 101 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980) · 42 U.S.C. § 9603 (§ 103 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980) · 42 U.S.C. § 9606 (§ 106 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980) · 42 U.S.C. § 9607 (§ 107 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980) · 42 U.S.C. § 9652 (§ 302 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980)

Relies on Landgraf v. USI Film Products · United States v. Lopez · National League of Cities v. Usery · Wickard v. Filburn · Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit Authority

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “although Congress did not include in CERCLA either legislative findings or a jurisdictional element, the statute remains valid as applied in this case because it regulates a class of activities that substantially affects interstate commerce.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “Where the class of activities is regulated and that class is within the reach of federal power, the courts have no power 'to excise, as trivial, individual instances' of the class.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “laws aimed directly at economic activity are most likely to satisfy the substantial effects test,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.