107 F.3d -910 - Lawrence v. Chater’s Empirical Analysis
107 F.3d 674 · 1997
Citation profile
4 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently July 2015
4 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Brown v. Chater · Oberst v. Shalala · Piepgras v. Chater · Clark v. Chater · Shelton v. Chater
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Substantial evidence is less than a preponderance, but enough so that a reasonable mind might find it adequate to support the conclusion.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Our role is to determine whether the Secretary's decision is supported by substantial evidence on the entire record.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Lewis v. Barnhart
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.