107 F.3d -967 - Flynn v. Chater’s Empirical Analysis
107 F.3d 617 · 1997
Citation profile
5 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently October 2016
5 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Polaski v. Heckler · Robinson v. Sullivan · Roe v. Chater · Naber v. Shalala · Riley v. Shalala
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Substantial evidence is less than a preponderance, but enough so that a reasonable mind might accept it as adequate to support a conclusion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ramirez v. Barnhart“substantial evidence in the record as a whole”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Burress v. Apfel
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.