Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 107 F.3d 1308 - Lang v. Star Herald

Lang v. Star Herald’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

54
cited by 54 later decisions
2
states following
April 2022
most recently cited

20 federal appellate · 8 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 54 later decisions — most recently April 2022 · most notably David Weber/appellant v. Strippit Inc (1999), Helfter v. United Parcel Service, Inc. (1997)

20 federal appellate · 8 district · 2 state decisions

3001997200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 701 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 703 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)

Relies on Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green · Texas Department of Community Affairs v. Burdine · St. Mary's Honor Center v. Hicks · United States Postal Service Board of Governors v. Aikens

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 54 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “because of or on the basis of pregnancy, childbirth, or related medical conditions;....”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Reference to [the McDonnell-Douglas burden-shifting] analysis is not necessary... or even recommended. The burden-shifting analysis is simply a procedural framework that progressively focuses the inquiry on the question of whether a material issue of discrimination in fact exists.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[i]t shall be an unlawful employment practice for an employer — ... to discharge any individual, ... because of such individual's ... sex, ....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.