Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 107 F.3d 685 - Trulis

Trulis’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

94
cited by 94 later decisions
1
states following
February 2026
most recently cited

32 federal appellate · 4 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 94 later decisions — most recently February 2026 · most notably Cooper v. Pickett (1997), Williamson v. General Dynamics Corp. (2000)

32 federal appellate · 4 district · 1 state decisions

4701995200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 1141 · 28 U.S.C. § 1927

Relies on Albemarle Paper Co. v. Moody · Griggs v. Provident Consumer Discount Co. · Stoll v. Gottlieb · Pledger v. Medlock · Fertel-Rust v. Milwaukee Police Department

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 94 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[o]nce a bankruptcy plan is confirmed, it is binding on all parties and all questions that could have been raised pertaining to the plan are entitled to res judicata effect.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “"Creditors who do not wish to release third party debtors pursuant to the principal debtor's plan of reorganization should object to confirmation of the plan on the ground that such a plan provision is violative of section 524 and not within the power, even jurisdiction, of the bankruptcy court. . . . The point is that only a direct attack is available and collateral attack is unavailable."”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[s]ince the plaintiffs never appealed the bankruptcy court's confirmation order, the order is a final judgment and plaintiffs cannot challenge the bankruptcy court's jurisdiction over the subject matter.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.