Hodge v. Dalton’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
9 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 45 later decisions — most recently June 2021 · most notably Environmental Defense Center, Inc. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.-Intervenor, v. United States Environmental Protection Agency (2003), D. Philip Veitch, Rev., Appella
9 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 10 U.S.C. § 101 (Acquisition Improvement and Accountability Act of 2007) · 10 U.S.C. § 1552 · 10 U.S.C. § 938 · 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 42 U.S.C. § 1985 · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 701 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 717 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 5 U.S.C. § 102
Relies on Feres v. United States · Chrysler Corporation v. Brown · Chappell v. Wallace · Lehman v. Nakshian · United States v. Shearer
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 45 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“limitations and conditions upon which the Government consents to be sued must be strictly observed and exceptions thereto are not to be implied.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“final regulation that varies from the proposal, even substantially, will be valid as long as it is `in character with the original proposal and a logical outgrowth of the notice and comments.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“members of the armed forces may not bring an action against the Government or armed service personnel for injuries during activity under the control or supervision of a commanding officer.” Hodge v. Dalton, 107 F.3d 705, 710 (9th Cir.1997) (citing McGowan v. Scoggins, 890 F.2d 128, 132 (9th Cir.1989)). This doctrine of intramilitary immunity is”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.