Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 107 FRD 202 - Jones v. 3M Co.

Jones v. 3M Co.’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
April 2016
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 6 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently April 2016

1 federal appellate · 6 district ·

401984199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on International Shoe Co. v. Washington · World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. Woodson · Hanson v. Denckla · Milliken v. Meyer · Shaffer v. Heitner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “due process requirements for personal jurisdiction must be met as to each individual Defendant.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.