Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 107 Haw. 308 - State v. Gomes

State v. Gomes’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
January 2023
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently January 2023

9 state decisions

40200520102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2253 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on United States v. Booker · Apprendi v. New Jersey · Blakely v. Washington · Teague v. Lane · Williams v. People of State of New York

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “any fact that increases the penalty for a crime beyond the prescribed statutory maximum must be submitted to a jury, and proved beyond a reasonable doubt.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “places certain kinds of primary private individual conduct beyond the power of the criminal law-making authority to proscribe,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the sentencing court shall state on the record its reasons for determining that commitment of the defendant for an extended term is necessary for protection of the public and shall enter into the record all findings of fact which are necessary to its decision.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.