Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 107 ILL 241 - Moore v. Topliff

Moore v. Topliff’s Empirical Analysis

1883

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
6
states following
December 1987
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 1 district · 13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently December 1987

1 federal appellate · 1 district · 13 state decisions

4018831890190019101920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Webster v. French · Warner v. Beardsley · Lewis v. . Palmer · Darst v. Bates · Dwen v. Blake

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A surety, after the debt has become due, may, without making payment himself, come into a court of equity and compel the principal to pay the debt. [Citations.] In 2 American Lead. Cases, 412, the rule is stated thus: `The surety stands in the position of an equitable assignee, and may use the remedies of the creditor, at his own risk and cost. He may accordingly file a bill against the principal to compel him to pay the debt at maturity, and make the creditor a party, because his interests are at stake, and in order that he may be at hand to receive the money.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.