Russell v. Moork

Decided March 31, 1903

Appellate Court of Illinois · decided 1903-03-31

Bill for an Injunction.—Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook County; the Hon. Arthur H. Chetlain, Judge presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the March term, 1903. Appellant filed his bill setting forth an argument by him made with Charles and George Moork, appellees, whereby, among other things, it was provided as follows: “ How, therefore, in consideration of the premises, the parties hereto agree as follows: First.

Affirmed · Decided 1903-03-31

Mr. Presiding Justice Waterman

¶1delivered the opinion of the court.

¶2Having examined the abstract filed by appellants and considered the briefs of counsel, we are of the opinion that the conclusions of the master are sustained by the evidence and that the decree of the court dismissing the bill was properly entered.

¶3We are also of the opinion that there is presented no sufficient reason for sustaining the cross-errors assigned upon the refusal of the court below to award damages upon the dissolution of the injunction following the dismissal of the bill.

¶4The decree is affirmed.