107 Ind. App. 621 - Kimmel v. Captain’s Empirical Analysis
1940
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 1 district · 10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently June 2011
2 federal appellate · 1 district · 10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on McCoy v. McCoy · Anderson v. Ackerman · Hall v. Essner · Kist v. Coughlin, Tr. · Dale v. Thomas
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The test of such inconsistency of remedies has its basis in the factual background which constitutes the cause of action. If the assertion of one cause of action involves the repudiation of another, then the modes of redress are inconsistent,. If the one cause of action admits a state of facts, and the other denies the same facts, the remedies sought by such actions are inconsistent.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.