Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 107 MDAPP 178 - Blades v. Woods

Blades v. Woods’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
November 2012
most recently cited

3 district · 8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently November 2012

3 district · 8 state decisions

50199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Will v. Michigan Department of State Police · Hickman v. Taylor · Trevino v. Celanese Corp. · Lieberman v. Gant · Clea v. Mayor of Baltimore

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Once the [individual] has demonstrated such need, the trial judge must determine what police department records exist and which of those records are confidential. This determination should be made in camera. Any reviewed records that are deemed not relevant or usable should be sealed and filed separately. Any records that appear to be discoverable shall then be reviewed at an expanded in camera hearing, with counsel of record present as officers of the court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.