107 Md. App. 311 - Gray v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
March 1998
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Bruton v. United States · Jackson v. Denno · Pointer v. Texas · Harrington v. California
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“did not have to make a substantial inference that [Gray] was [one of] the person[s] neutrally referenced in the redacted statement.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Gray“[Gray]'s role was clearly demonstrated by Bell's confession, rendering it facially incriminating[.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Gray“the jury could reasonably infer that it was appellant whose name had been `deleted.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Gray
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.