State v. Crow’s Empirical Analysis
1891
Citation profile
24 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently February 2010
24 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Wieners · State v. Alexander · Ingram v. State · Annis v. People · Commonwealth v. O'Brien
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Reputation, itself, can only be known from hearsay information and the courts give great latitude in cross-examination upon this question. `The real purpose (says Judge COOLEY in Annis v. People, 13 Mich. 511 ) of this cross-examination is to enable the court and jury to determine whether the impeaching witness in fact knows the general reputation of the other, and if so, whether he testifies truly in regard to it.' [1 Greenl. Ev., sec. 461; State v. Miller, 71 Mo. 90 ; State v. Beal, 68 Ind. 345 .]”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Johnson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.