Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 107 MO 350 - Nally v. Reading

Nally v. Reading’s Empirical Analysis

1891

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
3
states following
October 1981
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 22 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently October 1981

1 federal appellate · 22 state decisions

901891190019101920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Pierce v. Estate of Paine · Johnson v. Reading · Durand v. . Curtis · Sharp v. Rhiel

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Whatever may be the rule in equity as to the doctrine of part performance, that rule has no place in an action at law, as in the present instance.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.