Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 107 Nev. 864 - Erickson v. State

Erickson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
4
states following
November 2014
most recently cited

13 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. French · Nelson v. State · State v. Madril · 50 Wash. App. 125 - State v. Berman · 99 Or. App. 112 - State v. Voetberg

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a defendant may be ordered to pay restitution only for an offense that he has admitted, upon which he has been found guilty, or upon which he has agreed to pay restitution. . . . Such a rule embodies a fair reading of NRS 176.033(1) and avoids the manifest injustice of punishing defendants for charges to which they have neither admitted guilt nor been adjudicated guilty.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.