State v. Anderson’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
97 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 97 later decisions — most recently November 2018 · most notably State v. Flores (1996), State v. Haddenham (1990)
97 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · United States v. Brignoni-Ponce · Brown v. United States · United States v. Recalde · State v. Sisneros
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 97 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“do nothing more than highlight the ordinary, rather than the sinister”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“(1) there must be clear and positive testimony that the consent was specific and unequivocal; (2) the consent must be given without duress or coercion; and (3) the first two factors are to be viewed in light of the presumption that disfavors the waiver of constitutional rights.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Munoz“[i]t is for the trial court to weigh the evidence, determine the credibility of witnesses and decide if the evidence is sufficient to clearly and convincingly establish that the consent was voluntary.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. PAUL T.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.