Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 107 N.M. 231 - Reeves v. Wimberly

Reeves v. Wimberly’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

100
cited by 100 later decisions
2
states following
February 2022
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 8 district · 83 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 100 later decisions — most recently February 2022 · most notably Apodaca v. AAA Gas Co. (2003), State v. Gonzales (1990)

2 federal appellate · 8 district · 83 state decisions

48019881990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Parklane Hosiery Co. v. Shore · Montana v. United States · Silva v. State · Las Luminarias of the New Mexico Council of the Blind v. Isengard · Myers v. Olson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 100 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) the issue previously decided is identical with the one presented in the action in question, (2) the prior action has been finally adjudicated on the merits, (3) the party against whom the doctrine is invoked was a party, or in privity with a party prior to the adjudication, and (4) the party against whom the doctrine is raised had a full and fair opportunity to litigate the issue in the prior action”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “(1) the parties are the same or in privity with the parties in the original action; (2) the subject matter or cause of action in the two suits are different; (3) the ultimate facts or issues were actually litigated; and (4) the issue was necessarily determined.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “Upon a doubtful or deficient record, every presumption is indulged in favor of the correctness and regularity of the trial court's decision, and the appellate court will indulge in reasonable presumptions in support of the order entered.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.