Russell v. Protective Insurance’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
2 district · 50 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 54 later decisions — most recently November 2018 · most notably State Ex Rel. Clark v. Johnson (1995), Hovet v. Allstate Insurance (2004)
2 district · 50 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1011 (§ 1 of the McCarran-Ferguson Act)
Relies on 223 So. 2d 713 - Shingleton v. Bussey · 86 Wis. 2d 615 - Coleman v. American Universal Insurance Co. · Valdez v. Cillessen & Son, Inc. · Hayes v. Aetna Fire Underwriters · Stafford v. Westchester Fire Insurance Co. of New York, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 54 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“to recover against the insurer is consistent with the policy of the law authorizing causes of action under Article Sixteen.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Jolley v. AEGIS“the legislature did not intend to limit Article Sixteen simply to the traditional notion of `insured'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Jolley v. AEGIS“was an intended beneficiary of the contract between his employer and the insurer”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Jolley v. AEGIS
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.