Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 107 NW2D 697 - Cowl v. Wentz

Cowl v. Wentz’s Empirical Analysis

1961

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
5
states following
June 1989
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently June 1989

14 state decisions

80196119701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hart v. Bayless Investment & Trading Company · Williams v. City of LaGrange · City of Los Angeles v. Glassell · 156 Pa. Super. 1 - Potter Title & Trust Co. v. Berkshire Life Insurance · Bronson v. Johnson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Appeal after deposit for taking.— Within thirty days after notice has been given in writing to the landowner by the clerk of the district court that a deposit has been made for a taking of right of way as authorized by section fourteen of the constitution, the owner of the property taken may appeal to the district court by serving a notice of appeal upon the acquiring agency, and the matter shall be tried at the next regular or special term of court with a jury unless a jury be waived, in the manner prescribed for trials under chapter 32-15.” 2”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““[W]hen the state or any of its departments, agencies or political subdivisions seeks to acquire right of way, it may take possession upon making an offer to purchase and by depositing the amount of such offer with the clerk of the district court of the county wherein the right of way is located. The clerk shall immediately notify the owner of such deposit. The owner may thereupon appeal to the court in the manner provided by law, and may have a jury trial, unless a jury be waived, to determine the damages.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. ““Where giving of notice is relied on to sustain forfeiture or divestiture of one's rights, statutory directions as to how such notice shall be given must be strictly complied with. [[Image here]] “This is especially true as to every requisite of the statute having the semblance of benefit to the landowner.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.