107 Ohio App. 3d 194 - State v. Brown’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
66 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 68 later decisions — most recently March 2026 · most notably 143 Ohio App. 3d 232 - State v. High (2001), State v. Jackson (2006)
66 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Bridgeman · 36 Ohio App. 3d 147 - State v. Blevins · 51 Ohio App. 3d 215 - State v. Wolfe · State v. Powell · 96 Ohio App. 3d 440 - State v. Barzacchini
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 68 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he requirement of authentication or identification as a condition precedent to admissibility is satisfied by evidence sufficient to support a finding that the matter in question is what its proponent claims.”
16 later decisions quote this exact passage“that it is reasonably certain that substitution, alteration or tampering did not occur.”
11 later decisions quote this exact passage“Chain of custody is a part of the authentication and identification mandate set forth in Evid.R. 901, and the state has the burden of establishing the chain of custody of a specific piece of evidence.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.