107 Ohio App. 3d 239 - State v. Thomas’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

6 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “`Possess' or `possession' means having control over a thing or substance, but may not be inferred solely from mere access to the thing or substance through ownership or occupation of the premises upon which the thing or substance is found.”

   3 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Lee, Unpublished Decision (12-17-2004) · State v. Iser, Unpublished Decision (10-21-2005)

2. “conscious of the presence of the [cocaine].”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Lee, Unpublished Decision (12-17-2004) · State v. Carpenter

3. “Appellant's convictions were against the manifest weight of the evidence.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Carpenter