Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 107 Ohio App. 3d 296 - State v. Hummer

107 Ohio App. 3d 296 - State v. Hummer’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
August 2005
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 40 Ohio App. 3d 7 - State v. Addison · State v. McMullen · State v. Draper

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “By placing a defendant on probation, the judge has afforded the benefit of a reduced sentence conditioned upon the defendant's efforts to reform. A defendant has no expectation of finality in the original sentence when it is subject to his compliance with the terms of his probation. In the event of a violation of probation, the original sentence does not become final but is subject to modification within the standards of state law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.