107 Ohio App. 3d 557 - State v. O'Neil’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently October 2025
9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · State v. Jenks · Rohde v. Farmer · State v. Gordon
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Applying the Jenks [sufficiency] standard of viewing the evidence most favorably toward the state, the most any reasonable person might infer is that the O'Neil in this case is probably the same O'Neil in the 1984 case. But 'probably' does not reach proof beyond a reasonable doubt * * *”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Sandercock“sufficient evidence to identify the defendant named in the entry.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“a name alone is not sufficient to establish identity.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.