107 Ohio App. 3d 756 - State v. Matha’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
21 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently March 2026
21 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Bridgeman · State v. Tyler · 70 Ohio App. 3d 624 - State v. Lewis · 62 Ohio App. 3d 720 - State v. Penrod · 37 Ohio App. 2d 7 - In Re Bolden
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Some juveniles learn only through detention, which is itself a means and method of education and rehabilitation.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“The order of disposition in a juvenile case is a matter within the court's discretion.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“While the objective of the juvenile system is rehabilitation rather than punishment, `[t]he juvenile justice system, together with its rehabilitative objective, is purely a statutory creation * * * and it may contain punitive elements.' (Citation omitted.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.