Tucker v. McQuery’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
12 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 21 Ohio App. 3d 274 - Rinehart v. Toledo Blade Co. · 47 Ohio App. 2d 221 - State v. Spahr · 128 Ohio App. 3d 200 - Lewis v. Alfa Laval Separation, Inc. · 126 Ohio App. 3d 715 - White v. Center Manufacturing Co. · 113 Ohio App. 3d 572 - Krysa v. Sieber
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Jurors have a right to know who the real party in interest is.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Smith v. Summers
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.