Harmon v. Baldwin’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
1 district · 17 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently November 2023
1 district · 17 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Landrum · 103 Ohio St. 3d 27 - State v. Ahmed · State ex rel. Askew v. Goldhart · 98 Ohio St. 3d 298 - State ex rel. Denton v. Bedinghaus · Maschari v. Tone
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he court of appeals — acting as trial court * * * — had discretion to rule upon these motions, and the court's rulings will not be reversed absent an abuse of that discretion”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“`Abuse of discretion' connotes an unreasonable, arbitrary, or unconscionable attitude.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.