Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

107 Or. App. 249

810 P.2d 413

State v. King

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 15, 1991

Court of Appeals of Oregon · decided 1991-05-15

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently June 1992

2 state decisions

Applies OR 137 § 137.106

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1991-05-15

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

EDMONDS, J.,

¶1dissenting.

¶2I dissent, because the imposition of an order to pay restitution without consideration of defendant’s ability to pay, as required by ORS 137.106, is a sentence that exceeds the maximum allowed by law. See State v. Peters, 104 Or App 582, 801 P2d 904 (1990) (Edmonds, J., specially concurring).

/107/orapp/249 · .json · Public domain