107 Or. App. 708 - Harm v. Central Life Assurance Co.’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

1 federal appellate ·

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “a plaintiff does not have to present evidence!!,] other than its evidence of an improper motive[,] in order to prove that a defendant was not motivated in part by proper objectives. The fact finder may infer from the existence of an improper motive that it was the defendant’s only motive. Once there is evidence of both proper and improper motives, the trier of fact may find that the motives were all proper, all improper or a mixture of both.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 542 F. App'x 600 - Holly Johnston v. Kimberly-Clark Global Sales, LLC

2. “that a corporate officer, advisor or other agent who induces the corporation to breach a contract is liable to the other party for intentional interference with an economic relation only if benefit to the corporation played no role in the officer's action.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Janes v. Blodgett