State v. Easterlin’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
December 2012
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 122 Wash. 2d 270 - State v. Valdobinos · State v. Schelin · State v. Willis · 119 Wash. App. 712 - State v. Holt · State v. Schelin
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“THE COURT: You understand the elements of that crime that the State would have to prove if the case were to go to trial? THE DEFENDANT: Yes. THE COURT: And you understand the sentence that can be imposed by the Court on that case? THE DEFENDANT: Yes. THE COURT: . . . I should say that the unlawful possession of a controlled substance was while armed with a firearm and adding additional time to the presumptive sentence. THE DEFENDANT: Yes, I do, ma'am.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“the State need not prove a nexus between the defendant, the weapon, and the crime when the defendant actually possesses the firearm.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Rooth
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.