Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 107 SO2D 369 - Conrad v. Jackson

Conrad v. Jackson’s Empirical Analysis

1958

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
2
states following
October 1981
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently October 1981

14 state decisions

801958196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Josephson v. Autrey · Grover v. Van Heusden · 54 So. 2d 108 - Miami Shores Village v. Bessemer Properties · 47 So. 2d 321 - Fortunato v. City of Coral Gables · State Ex Rel. Kay v. City of Miami

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"We mention at the outset that in order to obtain relief against a violation of an ordinance of this nature, a property owner must demonstrate that he suffers peculiar injury and damage different in kind from that suffered by the community at large, as distinguished from a mere difference in degree of injury. * * *" (Emphasis added; 107 So.2d 369 )”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““It is necessary that we point up a deficiency in the proofs with reference to the zoning ordinance. Nowhere in the record do we find that the municipal zoning ordinance was ever placed in evidence. The parties refer to it and liberally quote from it in their briefs. In other respects, save for the opinion of the Chancellor, this court is completely in the dark as to the content of the ordinance. It simply does not appear in the record. The established rule is that courts cannot take judicial cognizance of municipal ordinances. We consequently cannot inquire into the provisions of an ordinance which is not before us.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “violation of a municipal zoning ordinance”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.