Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 107 SO3D 1029 - Barrow v. May

Barrow v. May’s Empirical Analysis

2012

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
August 2018
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · Kumho Tire Company, Ltd., et al. v. Patrick Carmichael, Etc., et al. · 863 So. 2d 31 - Mississippi Transp. Comm'n v. McLemore · Mississippi City Lines, Inc. v. Bullock · Poole Ex Rel. Poole v. Avara

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the plaintiff must introduce evidence which affords a reasonable basis for the conclusion that it is more likely than not that the conduct of the defendant was a cause in fact of the result. A mere possibility of such causation is not enough.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “The trial court's decision will stand unless the reviewing court concludes that the decision was arbitrary and clearly erroneous, amounting to an abuse of discretion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “In regard to the admissibility of expert witness testimony, the trial judge is to act as a gatekeeper, ensuring that expert testimony is both relevant and reliable.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.