May v. May’s Empirical Analysis
2013
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 437 So. 2d 1003 - Albright v. Albright · 824 So. 2d 623 - Sanderson v. Sanderson · 824 So. 2d 583 - Hensarling v. Hensarling · 614 So. 2d 394 - Smith v. Smith · 798 So. 2d 1284 - Lee v. Lee
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“An Albright analysis is not premised solely on a scoring system to determine which parent "wins," and our review for manifest error is not a mechanical check on the chancellor's score card to see if she "tallied" each parent's score correctly. Instead, we ask whether the chancellor considered all relevant facts, giving deference to the weight she assigns each factor.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.