Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

107 So. 3d 1185

Duncan v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 20, 2013

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2013-02-20

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently September 2018

1 federal appellate · 5 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2013-02-20

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1The appellant filed a postconviction motion claiming that counts two through four, for which he received five-year sentences, were to be concurrently imposed to each other, and consecutively imposed to count one, for which he also received a five-year sentence. He claims his total sentence is for ten years’ imprisonment. The state disagrees and argues that the appellant was sentenced to a total of 20 years’ imprisonment, with each count, for which he received five-year sentences, consecutively imposed to each other.

¶2Because a number of essential documents are missing from the record provided to this Court, which the state concedes, we reverse and remand for the trial court to attach the plea agreement, the original judgment and sentence, the motion seeking additional jail credit, the order providing for additional jail credit, the second judgment and sentence, and the rule 3.800(b) motion filed by the state, to hold an evidentiary hearing, or to provide relief to the appellant. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850(d).

¶3REVERSED AND REMANDED with instructions.

DAVIS, RAY, and SWANSON, JJ., concur.
/107/so3d/1185 · .json · Public domain