Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 107 SO3D 537 - Perez v. State

Perez v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2013

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
August 2014
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Chubbuck · State v. Hunter

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he state should have the opportunity to present evidence as to whether the DOC can provide the required “specialized treatment.” However, if the state presents such evidence ... the trial court is not precluded from granting [appellant’s] request for downward departure. ■ Rather, the state’s evidence is merely an additional factor which the trial court may consider in exercising its discretion as to whether to grant [appellant’s] request for downward departure.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.