Jenkins v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2013
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
June 2019
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 491 So. 2d 1129 - State v. DiGuilio · 919 So. 2d 647 - McCray v. State · Robinson v. State · 576 So. 2d 737 - Stanford v. State · 483 So. 2d 768 - Hendrieth v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a] statement is not hearsay if the declarant testifies at the trial or hearing and is subject to cross-examination concerning the statement and the statement is . . . [o]ne of identification of a person made after perceiving the person.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“situation contemplated by the code and the case law is one where the victim sees the assailant shortly after the criminal episode and says, 'that's the man.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the declarant was an eyewitness or a victim who identified the alleged perpetrator soon after the crime or soon after coming into contact with him or her.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.