Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 107 U.S. 64 - United States Burnett v. Teller

United States Burnett v. Teller’s Empirical Analysis

107 U.S. 64 · 1882

Citation profile

151
cited by 151 later decisions
12
cited 12 times by the Supreme Court
15
states following
June 2025
most recently cited

40 federal appellate · 11 district · 53 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 151 later decisions (12 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2025 · most notably Lynch v. United States (1934), Frisbie v. United States (1895)

40 federal appellate · 11 district · 53 state decisions — followed in 15 states

330188218901900191019201930194019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Walton v. Cotton

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 151 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “No pensioner has a vested legal right to his pension. Pensions are the bounties of the government, which Congress has the right to give, withhold, distribute, or recall, at its discretion. Walton v. Cotton, 19 How. 355 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.