Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 107 U.S. 655 - United States v. Britton

United States v. Britton’s Empirical Analysis

107 U.S. 655 · 1882

Citation profile

455
cited by 455 later decisions
22
cited 22 times by the Supreme Court
20
states following
April 2025
most recently cited

228 federal appellate · 64 district · 47 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 455 later decisions (22 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 2025 · most notably Swift Company v. United States (1905), Coffin v. United States (1895)

228 federal appellate · 64 district · 47 state decisions — followed in 20 states

540188218901900191019201930194019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Carll · United States v. Cook · United States v. Simmons · United States v. Mills

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 455 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““We think the willful misapplication made an offense by this statute means a misapplication for the use, benefit, or gain of the party charged, or of some company or person other than the association. Therefore, to constitute the offense of willful misapplication, there must be a conversion to his own use or the use of some one else of the moneys and funds of the association by the party charged.””
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “are, so far as we know, new in statutes creating offenses, and they are not used in describing any offense at common law. They have no settled meaning like the word”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “to injure or defraud the [banking] association or any other company or body politic or corporate, or any individual person, or to deceive any [bank] officer . . ., or any agent appointed to examine the affairs of [the bank] . . . .”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.