Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 107 WASH 468 - State v. Dericho

State v. Dericho’s Empirical Analysis

1919

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
2
states following
August 1996
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently August 1996

16 state decisions

80191919201930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Evans v. State · State v. Findling · 34 Cal. App. 686 - People v. Dueber

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The third contention, that the court erred in refusing to accept an incomplete verdict, and in sending the jury out a second time to find a verdict upon the issue as to a former conviction, is also without merit. “The rule is well settled that the court may, with proper instructions, recommit a verdict to the jury for their reconsideration, where the verdict which they have rendered is not in the proper form, where it is insufficient in substance, not responsive to or covering the issues or instructions, or is otherwise defective . . . ” 38 Cyc. 1893, and cases there cited.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.