Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 107 Wash. 2d 331 - State v. Hansen

107 Wash. 2d 331 - State v. Hansen’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
2
states following
April 2002
most recently cited

15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently April 2002

15 state decisions

100198619902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 44 Wash. 2d 667 - Bowman v. Webster · State ex rel. Lefebvre v. Clifford · 44 Wash. 2d 828 - State Ex Rel. Mauerman v. SUP'R CT. FOR THURSTON CTY. · 74 Wash. 2d 700 - State v. Dixon · 102 Wash. 2d 457 - Marine Power & Equipment Co. v. Department of Transportation

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “RCW 4.12.040 provides that, when prejudice has been established by motion and supporting affidavit, "the presiding judge . . . shall forthwith transfer the action to another department of the same court, or call in a judge from some other court." The statute thus imposes a singular duty: Upon proper filing of an affidavit of prejudice, the judge must reassign the case.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “petitioner waived his right to a change of judge when he rejected Judge Buckley's offer to trade places with Judge Kristianson.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “This court has often stressed the mandatory, nondiscretionary nature of this rule.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.