107 Wash. 2d 403 - State v. Hampton’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
December 2009
most recently cited
17 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 102 Wash. 2d 68 - Davis v. Globe MacHine Manufacturing Co. · 93 Wash. 2d 454 - State v. Dailey · State v. Jackschitz · 85 Wash. 2d 935 - State v. Elizondo · State v. Olson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“`A trial court abuses its discretion when its exercise of discretion is manifestly unreasonable or based upon untenable grounds or reasons.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Because the trial court did not provide any reasons for its decision, we cannot say it based its decision on tenable grounds or reasons.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“as provided in RCW 10.19.100r " RCW 10.19.105 (emphasis added). Section .100 permits, but does not require, a surety to request a stay: a surety "may stay said execution ... by giving a bond ... unless [the default judgment] shall be vacated before the expiration of that time. " (Emphasis added.) The permissive stay is granted so that "the surety [may receive] temporary relief from the harshness of forfeiture.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Kramer
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.